Incorporating information from sources

By -

 

This is my response to a task to create an academic skills lesson.

Topic: 

How to incorporate information from sources 

Broad discipline area: 

Social sciences

Target audience:

1st Year Undergraduate students


Lesson aims

To introduce and practise:

  • reading with a purpose.
  • summarising, paraphrasing and synthesising.
  • collaborative learning.
  • critical thinking.

 


1. Read the text about race assigned to your group and, as a group, write a short definition in the Table 1:


2. Read the other two texts and check if you agree with the other groups' definitions.

3. With your original group, compare the definitions from the three texts as outlined in Table 2:



4. Using the three definitions, write a cohesive response to the question: What is race? Do this individually.

Remember to cite each author and year of publication.

5. Compare in your group.

6. Then compare your output with this model:

Small (2006) writes that race as a concept or theory originated in the 18th and 19th centuries, when it was sought to classify variations within human beings. Later, he introduces the term ‘racialisation,’ which is said to be attached to social, cultural, and political factors. Banton (2018) echoes this historical perspective, detailing that from the 16th to the 18th century, much of what was understood about human variation was gained through the lens of natural theology. He further describes the meaning of ‘race’ as belonging to two dimensions: a vertical and a horizontal one. The former view attributes human variation to historical origins, wherein heredity and genealogy make up the foundation, while the latter view describes the nature of these variations within humans. According to Guess (2006), the idea of ‘race’ is no longer based on biological factors, but rather on social significance. That is, ‘race’ is a socially constructed concept. This view falls within the definition of ‘racialisation’ as described by Small (2006). All three these authors emphasise that ‘race’ is a modern concept.


Resources/References:

Banton, M. (2018). What we now know about race and ethnicity (1st ed.). [Open access]: Berghahn. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt130h8qv [excerpt: pp. 11-14].

 

Guess, J. T. (2006). The social construction of whiteness: Racism by intent, racism by consequence. Critical Sociology, 32(4), pp. 653 – 656 [excerpt].

 

Small, S. (2006). Race and racialisation. In J. Scott (Ed.), Sociology: The key concepts (pp. 131-134). Abingdon, England: Routledge.


Image:

pixabay




1.    


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Moves Like Swales

By -
Image
  The CARS model In his seminal work on genre analysis published in 1990, John Swales introduced the revised version of his Create a Research Space (CARS) model. Adika (2014, p. 58) explains that this model  'describes the rhetorical moves that researchers utilize to claim research space in their disciplines in a highly competitive environment.' Specifically, the CARS model pertains to the introduction section of research articles (RA). Swales (1990) points out that introductions can be difficult to write. This is because RA authors have an array of options at their disposal for how they might approach the opening paragraphs.  The CARS model comprises 3 rhetorical moves, each with particular steps (See Table 1). Hyland (2006, p. 50) defines a rhetorical move as ‘a distinct communicative act designed to achieve a particular communicative function’. Put another way, a rhetorical move is a stretch of text anywhere from a phrase to a paragraph with a particular job (Rienecker, 2021
Read more

GELT vs EAP

By -
Image
General English language teaching (GELT) is the context in which I have honed, and to a large extent am still honing, my teaching skills. Like English for Academic Purposes (EAP) contexts, GELT comes with its own unique set of challenges and rewards. In this post, I look at some of the differences between these two contexts through the prism of my experience. Therefore, the reader should be aware of the anecdotal nature of my commentary. Alexander, Argent, and Spencer (2018, pp. 11-13) outline differences along three categories, namely context, people, and teaching and learning content. I will now briefly explore each of these and their sub-categories. Context What drives the syllabus? In GELT contexts, the syllabus is level driven. These are typically labelled Beginner, Elementary, Pre-intermediate, etc. Some schools and institutions might also refer to these levels as A1, A2, B1, etc [based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)]. New students ar
Read more