The 'One nation, One language' Ideology

By -

 Introduction

The term ideology, coined by the French philosopher Antoine Destutt de Tracy in 1796, could be said, according to Nana (2016, p. 168), to refer to:

'the very habits of mind, beliefs, assumptions, expectations, which govern the life of an individual and a group and which often are superimposed on the world in order to give it structure or meaning'.

Given this description, as I see it, ideology might be viewed as a way of projecting the inner workings of the mind, whether consciously or unconsciously, to create external structure/s or realities, as well as the projection itself. In other words, ideology encompasses the thought, the action, and the outcome.

Nana (2016) argues that the relationship between language and ideology is one that includes concepts related to the social and linguistic, and accompanying interests of a moral and political nature. One incarnation of language ideology is “the ‘one nation, one language’ model of language and identity that developed in Europe in the eighteenth century.” (Nana, 2016, p. 169). This construct, Nana (2016) clarifies, seeks to create language uniformity and a shared sense of identity and national pride. 

However, the existence of varieties and dialects of the same language suggests that seeking to establish this common language and identity is a futile endeavour. In fact, these variants might be seen as deviating from the so-called standardised norm, often resulting in stigmatisation and social categorisation (Nana, 2016; Rosa, 2016). A dialect can be defined as “a variety of a language that differs from others along three dimensions: vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation (accent).” (Edwards, 2009, p. 63). 

In the case of English, even before exploring its numerous varieties, it is worth reminding ourselves of its broad and diverse lexical range. Crystal (2011) likens English to a vacuum-cleaner as its speakers from all levels of society and varying contexts suck in phrases from other languages encountered along the way. In fact, hundreds of languages have added something to the English lexical character. Additionally, unlike some other languages where the ideal is to adhere to cultural tradition, and an aversion to loanwords is perpetuated, English speakers often create new vocabulary, showing a willingness to depart from convention when doing so (Crystal, 2011).

TESOL in South Africa

It seems inevitable that when there is a call for language and identity uniformity, a dichotomy will emerge. One such dichotomy is the native/non-native English speaker (NES/NNES) divide. Although the concept native speaker often comes in for criticism (Rampton, 1999), for the sake of brevity, we might broadly define it as someone who learned a language in childhood (Cook, 1999).

In South Africa, in my experience, NES/NNES are often defined along racial lines. Briefly, white people are assumed to be NES, while everyone else is not. That said, this is also true in at least one other context, Canada, where immigrant teachers of English reported that their students believed being a NES was the privilege of white Canadians only (Sutherland, 2012). The truth is, the vast majority of South Africans, irrespective of racial classification, speak more than one language in the professional sphere as well as at home (Alexander, 2021). This makes South Africa a truly multilingual society, which is something to take pride in. 

However, in the teaching English to speakers of other languages (TESOL) field in the South African context, some teachers seem to feel that admitting any knowledge of any of the other eleven official languages might somehow diminish their professional identity. It appears that being a NES is seen (at least by teachers) as the primary, if not quite the only, criterion for becoming an English Language teacher. This situation is not unique to South Africa. Speaking globally, Sutherland points out that “There is sometimes the assumption that simply speaking English well is enough to qualify someone as a teacher.” (2012, p. 62). This might be because NES teachers are often given preferential treatment in TESOL (Sutherland, 2012). 

However, as mentioned before, not all NES are created equally. In the TESOL field, only a select group of NES teachers will be privileged. These are usually those who are exponents of English as it is used by the most socially powerful (Sutherland, 2012). Referencing Kachru, Peirce (1989) writes about the linguistic power that comes with knowing English, and citing Cooke, she states that English belongs to the elites, serving the dominant classes. Further, Peirce asks if TESOL aims “to entrench the power of an elite, privileged group…” (1989, p. 402), suggesting its goal should be to transform.

This view that NES status and being white are inextricably linked also leads to cases where NNES are employed as English language teachers on the basis of their perceived race (Sutherland, 2012). This is only a problem if the selection is made on this basis rather than on competence, experience and qualifications. All things being equal, race, nationality and English language speaker status should be of no consequence to a teacher’s suitability for any position.

Conclusion

While the goals of the ‘one language, one nation’ ideology might be to establish unity and a single identity amongst diverse groups of people, the reality is that this perceived ideal could lead to discord. For one, different forms of a language means different discourse communities, with their own, unique identities, exist within the same language. Further, the prominence of a language form is often due to social power, and might create a situation of elitism. Thus, speaking the same language, and even being of the same nationality, cannot guarantee the realisation of these ideological goals. In the TESOL field, South Africa’s multilingualism is usually not celebrated. An English-only status and being white are often used as markers of competence, and to which greater importance is assigned. With all that said, it would seem that a far better ideology might be one where all varieties are celebrated and an openness to accepting influences from other languages maintained.

References

Alexander, M. (2021) The 11 languages of South Africa. Available at: https://southafrica-info.com/arts-culture/11-languages-south-africa/ (Accessed: 19 March 2022).

Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), pp. 185-209.

Crystal, D. (2011). The Story of English in 100 words. Suffolk, England: Profile Books.

Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity: An introduction. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Nana, G. (2016). Language ideology and the colonial legacy in Cameroon schools: A historical perspective. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), pp. 168-196.

Peirce, B. N. (1989). Toward a Pedagogy of Possibility in the Teaching of English Internationally: People’s English in South Africa. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), pp. 401-420.

Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), pp. 97-101.

Rosa, J. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), pp. 162-183.

Sutherland, S. (2012). Native and non-native English teachers in the classroom: a re-examination. Arab World English Journal, 3(4), pp. 58-71.


Image

pixabay

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Incorporating information from sources

By -
Image
  This is my response to a task to create an academic skills lesson. Topic:  How to incorporate information from sources  Broad discipline area:  Social sciences Target audience: 1st Year Undergraduate students Lesson aims To introduce and practise: reading with a purpose. summarising, paraphrasing and synthesising. collaborative learning. critical thinking.   1.  Read the text about race assigned to your group and, as a group , write a short definition in the Table 1 : 2. Read the other two texts and check if you agree with the other groups' definitions. 3. With your original group, compare the definitions from the three texts as outlined in Table 2 : 4. Using the three definitions, write a cohesive response to the question: What is race? Do this individually. Remember to cite each author and year of publication. 5. Compare in your group. 6. Then compare your output with this model: Small (2006) writes that race as a concept or theory originated in the 18 th and 19 th
Read more

Moves Like Swales

By -
Image
  The CARS model In his seminal work on genre analysis published in 1990, John Swales introduced the revised version of his Create a Research Space (CARS) model. Adika (2014, p. 58) explains that this model  'describes the rhetorical moves that researchers utilize to claim research space in their disciplines in a highly competitive environment.' Specifically, the CARS model pertains to the introduction section of research articles (RA). Swales (1990) points out that introductions can be difficult to write. This is because RA authors have an array of options at their disposal for how they might approach the opening paragraphs.  The CARS model comprises 3 rhetorical moves, each with particular steps (See Table 1). Hyland (2006, p. 50) defines a rhetorical move as ‘a distinct communicative act designed to achieve a particular communicative function’. Put another way, a rhetorical move is a stretch of text anywhere from a phrase to a paragraph with a particular job (Rienecker, 2021
Read more

GELT vs EAP

By -
Image
General English language teaching (GELT) is the context in which I have honed, and to a large extent am still honing, my teaching skills. Like English for Academic Purposes (EAP) contexts, GELT comes with its own unique set of challenges and rewards. In this post, I look at some of the differences between these two contexts through the prism of my experience. Therefore, the reader should be aware of the anecdotal nature of my commentary. Alexander, Argent, and Spencer (2018, pp. 11-13) outline differences along three categories, namely context, people, and teaching and learning content. I will now briefly explore each of these and their sub-categories. Context What drives the syllabus? In GELT contexts, the syllabus is level driven. These are typically labelled Beginner, Elementary, Pre-intermediate, etc. Some schools and institutions might also refer to these levels as A1, A2, B1, etc [based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)]. New students ar
Read more