Task: Differentiation

By -

 What differentiation is and isn’t



Tomlinson (2001, p. 1) explains that differentiation ‘provides different avenues to acquiring content, to processing or making sense of ideas, and to developing products so that each student can learn effectively.’ [emphasis added]. Content refers to the input or what we expect students to learn, process comprises multiple sense-making approaches deployed by students, and product is the output or how learning is demonstrated. The common thread running through these approaches is that they are designed with the purpose of significant student development in mind (Tomlinson, 2001).

Tomlinson goes on to clarify that differentiation is not to be confused with individualized instruction as it was practised in the 1970s, where the aim was to come up with something different for each of the more than 30 students often found in a class. She emphasises that it includes ‘whole-class, group, and individual instruction’ (2001, p. 5). 

The task

I was asked to outline a lesson based on the topic of Natural Disasters found at https://www.globalissues.org/article/568/media-and-natural-disasters

I was also asked to consider a higher (IELTS 6.5 – 7.5) and a lower (IELTS 5.5 – 6.5) group and explain how I might use differentiation in my lesson. What follows is my attempt. 

Lesson focus: A seminar

Put students in groups of 4/5.

Higher group

Seminar questions (substantiate your opinion):

  • Is media coverage of natural disasters selective?
  • Do some regions that have been hit by a natural disaster get more attention than others?
  • Compare media coverage of the following natural disasters that occurred in 2005:

    1. Pakistan and Indian earthquake
    2. Food shortages in West and Southern Africa
    3. Typhoons in East Asia
    4. Devastating hurricanes affecting Central America and the US

Before the seminar:

  • Compare your notes with your assigned group.
  • Together, think of at least 4 questions you would like to discuss during the seminar.

Teacher's notes

  • Explain the main purpose of the seminar: to deepen understanding of the subject and to develop critical thinking.
  • Explain that this is a safe space and that everyone should try to participate.
  • Collate questions from groups and add to the list. Display the list so that students can refer to it whenever they need to.

Rationale

Seminars are common teaching and learning methods, and therefore it is crucial that students become familiar with them (Alexander, Argent & Spencer, 2018). Students also need to become familiar with the consequential or chronological nature of discourse construction. For example, before they can participate in a seminar, they need to do some reading and/or listen to a lecture, make notes, and perhaps share and develop those notes [genre chains]. It is also useful for them to become aware of the intertextuality of argument construction. In writing, for instance, they will be required to refer to other authors' writing in order to substantiate their arguments [genre networks]. For more on genre chains and genre networks, see Swales, 2004.

With this higher group, it can be expected that they research and read materials to find relevant information. While some might not have well-developed study skills (e.g., how to read a text, note-taking, etc.), their greater language proficiency should give them a reasonable chance of success. During reflection after the lesson, or in a phase during the task, students could be given model strategies for note-taking, note-building, etc., and be asked to compare and assess their own strategies using specified criteria.

 By asking them to collaborate on producing more questions, their criticality might also be developed. In other words, a seminar requires multiple skills and strategies, making it an extremely useful learning/teaching method. Students are asked to work independently as well as collaboratively, and to make decisions on their own as well as in conjunction with others. These are all real-world skills that they will need to be familiar with on their degree programme and beyond. 

For the lower group, I suggest adapting this task in this way:

  • Restrict the reading by setting 2/3 articles.
  • Have 10-12 seminar questions that students can use to guide their reading.
  • Do not ask students to produce their own questions (of course, there’s nothing wrong with them doing so of their own accord).
  • Give them access to a model of a seminar (video) [both groups].
  • Along with the video, highlight useful language (e.g., for stating/inviting an opinion, agreeing/disagreeing, referring to something said earlier, moving on to another point, etc.) [both groups].
  • Let them have a “dry run,” either in small groups or as a class.
  • Give/invite feedback on procedures, strategies as well as language [both groups].
Looking at this again, I can see what other routes I might have taken with this task. This is what makes differentiated instruction so interesting. Using the resource given at the beginning of this blog, what type of lesson might you design and how would you differentiate?

References

Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2018). EAP essentials: A teacher’s guide to principles and practice (2nd ed.). Reading, England: Garnet.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 


Image

pixabay

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Incorporating information from sources

By -
Image
  This is my response to a task to create an academic skills lesson. Topic:  How to incorporate information from sources  Broad discipline area:  Social sciences Target audience: 1st Year Undergraduate students Lesson aims To introduce and practise: reading with a purpose. summarising, paraphrasing and synthesising. collaborative learning. critical thinking.   1.  Read the text about race assigned to your group and, as a group , write a short definition in the Table 1 : 2. Read the other two texts and check if you agree with the other groups' definitions. 3. With your original group, compare the definitions from the three texts as outlined in Table 2 : 4. Using the three definitions, write a cohesive response to the question: What is race? Do this individually. Remember to cite each author and year of publication. 5. Compare in your group. 6. Then compare your output with this model: Small (2006) writes that race as a concept or theory originated in the 18 th and 19 th
Read more

Moves Like Swales

By -
Image
  The CARS model In his seminal work on genre analysis published in 1990, John Swales introduced the revised version of his Create a Research Space (CARS) model. Adika (2014, p. 58) explains that this model  'describes the rhetorical moves that researchers utilize to claim research space in their disciplines in a highly competitive environment.' Specifically, the CARS model pertains to the introduction section of research articles (RA). Swales (1990) points out that introductions can be difficult to write. This is because RA authors have an array of options at their disposal for how they might approach the opening paragraphs.  The CARS model comprises 3 rhetorical moves, each with particular steps (See Table 1). Hyland (2006, p. 50) defines a rhetorical move as ‘a distinct communicative act designed to achieve a particular communicative function’. Put another way, a rhetorical move is a stretch of text anywhere from a phrase to a paragraph with a particular job (Rienecker, 2021
Read more

GELT vs EAP

By -
Image
General English language teaching (GELT) is the context in which I have honed, and to a large extent am still honing, my teaching skills. Like English for Academic Purposes (EAP) contexts, GELT comes with its own unique set of challenges and rewards. In this post, I look at some of the differences between these two contexts through the prism of my experience. Therefore, the reader should be aware of the anecdotal nature of my commentary. Alexander, Argent, and Spencer (2018, pp. 11-13) outline differences along three categories, namely context, people, and teaching and learning content. I will now briefly explore each of these and their sub-categories. Context What drives the syllabus? In GELT contexts, the syllabus is level driven. These are typically labelled Beginner, Elementary, Pre-intermediate, etc. Some schools and institutions might also refer to these levels as A1, A2, B1, etc [based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)]. New students ar
Read more